Archive for the Category ◊ Jonathan - General ◊

02 Oct 2008 The Meme
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  2 Comments

Okay, for the Jonathan side of the Watsons:

1. YOUR ROCK STAR NAME (first pet, current car): Junior Mazda

2. YOUR GANGSTA NAME (fave ice cream flavor, favorite type of shoe): Cookie Dough Wingtip

3. YOUR NATIVE AMERICAN NAME (favorite color, favorite animal): Navy Cat

4. YOUR SOAP OPERA NAME (middle name, city where you were born): Andrew Erie

5. YOUR STAR WARS NAME (the first three letters of your last name, first two of your first name): WatJa

6. SUPERHERO NAME (2nd favorite color, favorite drink): Forest Coffee

7. NASCAR NAME (the first names of your grandfathers): Chester Joseph

8. STRIPPER NAME ( the name of your favorite perfume/cologne/scent, favorite candy): Curry Candy Corn

9. TV WEATHER ANCHOR NAME (your fifth grade teacher’s last name, a major city that starts with the same letter): Davis Denver

10. SPY NAME (your favorite season/holiday, flower): Spring Dogwood

11. CARTOON NAME (favorite fruit, article of clothing you’re wearing right now): Orange Khakis

12. HIPPIE NAME (What you ate for breakfast, your favorite tree): Eggs Dogwood

31 Aug 2008 The Four Loves
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  Leave a Comment

Recently, I finished a reread of C.S. Lewis’ The Four Loves, which as (as titled) Lewis’ discussion of the four different kinds of love - affection, friendship, eros, and charity. I recommend this book for any Christian, and Catholics especially, since Pope Benedict’s encyclical Deus Caritas Est contains many of the same ideas (if not developed in a more specifically Catholic direction).

To (hopefully) whet your appetite, here are a few excerpts dealing with each type of love:

  1. Affection: “The dog barks at stranges who have never don it any harm and wags its tail for old acquaintances even if they never did it a good turn. The child will love a crusty old gardener who has hardly ever taken any notice of it and shrink from the visitor who is making every attempt to win its regard.”
  2. Friendship: “The first and most obvious answer is that few value it because few experience it. And the possibility of going through life without the experience is rooted in that fact which separates Friendship so sharply from the other loves. Friendship is - in a sense not at all derogatory to it - the lease natural of loves; the least instinctive, organic, biological, gregarious, and necessary….In this kind of love, as Emerson said, Do you love me? means Do you see the same truth? - or at least, “Do you care about the same truth?”
  3. Eros: “Sexual desire, without Eros, wants it, the thing in itself; Eros wants the Beloved.”
  4. Charity: “If the Victorians needed the reminder that love is not enough, older theologians were always saying very loudly that (natural) love is likely to be a great deal too much. The danger of loving our fellow-creatures too little was less present to their minds than loving them idolatrously. In every wife, mother, child and friend they saw a possible rival to God. So of course does Our Lord.”

In short, get it, read it. It is short and poignant, and well worth it.

–j.

17 Aug 2008 Book Review - Render Unto Caesar
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  One Comment

Upon the recommendation of my friend John, I purchased Render Unto Caesar, subtitled Serving the Nation by Living Our Catholic Beliefs in Political Life, by the Archbishop of Denver, Charles J. Chaput, OFM Cap. (a.k.a. Capuchin Franciscan). Now that I have finished it (and John has asked to borrow it), I have decided to write this short review of the book. At around 230 pages, including intro, endnotes, etc., the book is not exceptionally long. I found this relatively short length is even more suprising as I read through the book. Archbishop Chaput has written a tour de force of a book, discussing the history of Catholic political engagement in the United States (where we were), current political activity of Catholics in the United States (where we are), and Vatican II and it’s postlude (how we got here).

Or, in the Archbishop’s words:

Like it or not, American Catholics are part of a struggle over our country’s identity and future. If this book helps some of us rediscover what it really means to be Catholic - the purpose of our time in the world, the lessons of our history, the responsibilities of citizenship, and the implications of the Christian faith we claim to believe - then it succeeds.

Throughout the book, Archbishop Chaput displays a wide knowledge of Catholic thinkers and Catholic history. John Courtney Murray, Henri de Lubac, Yves Congar, John Henry Newman, and Christopher Dawson are all mentioned. However, he also expands to discuss others such as C.S. Lewis, Victor Frankl, George Orwell, Christopher Lasch, and Lord Acton. (My own thought has been consistently expanded by some of these, especially C.S. Lewis and Christopher Lasch.) None are quoted simply for effect - all add something of importance to the discussion.

I find this book especiually important for several reasons. First, it excels as an overview of the history of American Catholicism, from a discussion of Charles Carroll, the Catholic Senator from Maryland who signed the Declaration of Independence through to John Kennedy, Mario Cuomo, and Robert Casey, Sr., three modern Catholic politicians. In examining the lives and talks of these individuals, the Archbishop charts a course for Catholic readers as to public and private political life (and suggest even that this distinction is too often of too much importance). Second, this book carefully dissects slogans and bad arguments used against Catholics (and other Christians). He uses as an example such phrases as “the separation of church and state” and “don’t impose your beliefs on society” and shows that they are less than argument and more like “a kind of verbal voodoo” employed “to shut down serious thought.” Third, this book is intended to give Catholics and any other Christian reader courage to argue for their beliefs in civil society. He notes that we do not argue for certain things because they are religious beliefs taught by the Church alone - rather, they are taught by the Church because they are right.

Finally, as with any book, the direct purposes are not the only ones which arise. I enjoyed this book, as I do many similar works, in some way just for the joy of contact with a well-organized mind. The book is not a difficult read, nor does it require any sort of “pre-reading” in order to understand it. Rather, it is beautifully laid-out and argued, and is likely to be one which I will re-read several times, discovering something new, and some new direction, each time.

-j.

10 Aug 2008 Sunday Night Laughs to Tears
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  One Comment

From Smurray comes this jewel - if your kids watch Dora, see this link now:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1FfL9_P5LE 

(Mostly safe for work - probably not for kids…)

-j.

07 Aug 2008 On Meaning
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  2 Comments

I’ve been considering the idea of “meaning,” in its more or less emotive context, over the past few days. One of the things that has struck me repeatedly is that in order for something to have meaning in our lives - and now that I see this, it strikes me as so simple that I wonder if it’s even worthwhile discussing - we must acknowledge some sort of personal limitation on ourselves by that thing. This is not a limitation in the sense of being fenced by an exterior force, but rather a self-limiting, a self-giving or gift, which results in a personal connection with that thing.

I think it may be analogized with art. Consider painting. The canvas, of whatever size, is the limitation. Or sculpture. The sculptor pares away stone (for instance), gradually evolving a figure out of it. Meaning is only acquired by limitation of space in accordance with reason. (Perhaps this is why “modern art” seems so devoid. The artists seeks no self-limitation, and asks none of you - interpretations might limit the artist in some way, and so therefore, the art is literally without meaning in being without limitation.)

This idea of meaning through limitation seems contrary to what society demands. Limitation is viewed as constriction on freedom (whether imposed within or without). However, in demanding unlimited access to anything, one thereby makes that thing devoid of meaning, for such is the emotional effect of unfettered choice.

-j.

01 Aug 2008 My next book to read…
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  One Comment

I plan to read Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, in preparation for a potential ministry I’ll be working on at Holy Cross College. Here’s an interesting excerpt (from a summary written by the book’s author, Christian Smith):

[W]e suggest that the de facto dominant religion among contemporary teenagers in the United States is what we might call “Moralistic Therapeutic Deism.” The creed of this religion, as codified from what emerged from our interviews with U.S. teenagers, sounds something like this:

1. A God exists who created and orders the world and watches over human life on earth.

2. God wants people to be good, nice, and fair to each other, as taught in the Bible and by most world religions.

3. The central goal of life is to be happy and to feel good about oneself.

4. God does not need to be particularly involved in one’s life except when he is needed to resolve a problem.

5. Good people go to heaven when they die.

I’ll post again when I’ve finished the work.

-J.

03 Jul 2008 Theodicy - “Doors of the Sea”
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  Leave a Comment

The book Doors of the Sea - Where Was God in the Tsunami is a deceptively small book. At about 100 pages, and no larger than an average mouse pad (which is a comparison I can readily make from visual observation), it nonetheless contains one of the best summations of Christian responses to the problem of how a world which is supposed to be the product of a good and loving God nonetheless contains suffering and other evil. The book is an expansion of two articles, one for the WSJ and one for First Things on the same topic, and I recommend that you read the First Things article.

One of the great statements Hart makes both in his book and article concerns the arguments (railings?) against God by Ivan Karamazov, from Dostoevsky’s great work The Brothers Karamazov. Having set forth the arguments, Hart notes:

But Ivan’s rebellion is something altogether different. Voltaire sees only the terrible truth that the actual history of suffering and death is not morally intelligible. Dostoevsky sees—and this bespeaks both his moral genius and his Christian view of reality—that it would be far more terrible if it were.

Some other important discussions in the book, which I think will open up new avenues for my own personal exploration are the idea of the impassibility of God (that God does not experience pain or pleasure from the actions of any other being), the difficulty of reconciling free will with evil (if God created creatures with free will, and knew that they would then engage in evil, isn’t God somehow responsible for evil? And how can a good God be responsible for evil?), and so on.

Hart takes a very patristical approach to the question, and his response is one of a classic Christian and Orthodox theologian. As such, his thoughts may be unsettling to many outside of the Catholic or Orthodox traditions. However, to those inside such traditions, his thought is both lucid and illuminating. He is somewhat harsh (if his writing can be called such) with John Calvin, and Calvin’s assertion of the “idea of a God who can be called omnipotent only if his will is the direct efficient cause of every aspect of created reality.” (See Where Was God? An Interview with David Bentley Hart) Hart notes that this doctrine often appears in (to his mind) extremely mistaken responses of Christian theologians to the Tsunami of 2004 in the Pacific rim. Taken to an extreme, these responses took the Calvinist doctrine to its logical end by asserting (in various ways) either that suffering is necessary, and / or that suffering is created and used by God to some end. He makes a careful distinction between God’s ability to bring good out of evil, and suffering as some creation or tool of God. The distinction, he believes, is illustrated by the statement that Christ did not come to reconcile or explain death (evil) to humanity, but to conquer it.

Provocative, yet completely orthodox Christian thought (deliberate use of the small “o” there).

01 Jul 2008 Michael Ruhlman’s Blog
 |  Category: Food, Jonathan - General |  One Comment

Michael Ruhlman is a chef and writer who was recently featured as a judge on the show, “The Next Iron Chef.” He also runs a blog - ruhlman.com - which is filled with excellent tidbits as well as memoirs about his travels and ideas. His book, The Elements of Cooking, has been reviewed quite positively and extensively, and is on my “sometime to purchase” list.

Meanwhile, check out the blog - http://blog.ruhlman.com/ruhlmancom/2008/07/elements-cast-i.html - most of his posts will echo today’s, which has helpful and intelligent commentary on cast iron cookware.

-j.

25 Jun 2008 Evening Reflection…
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  Leave a Comment

Well, I just got off the phone with a good friend, and it’s about time to head to bed, but I thought I’d reflect a bit on the day first. Today was an exceptionally long day. Not really in terms of length, but more in terms of task shifting. Being somewhat ADHD, I do best on workdays where I have 1-2 tasks upon which I can focus. Today, I dealt with at least 10 discrete tasks, usually lasting about 15 minutes each. That’s EXHAUSTING! I finished the day with a slight dizziness.

And, of course, the massive dietary change isn’t helping. :P

Oh, well. Off to sleep!

23 Jun 2008 South Beach - Day 1

Anne and I decided to take on the South Beach diet. She, because she eats too many carbs and me, because I drink too many carbs. Plus, my waistline has gotten distinctly tighter lately, and I am far too cheap to purchase new pants and get alterations.

What will this involve? Well, for the first two weeks, it’s almost no carbs. We’ll be avoiding going the all-red-meat route so as to avoid descending the evolutionary tree. (Although gnawing the opposing lawyer’s hand everytime s/he makes an objection in court would have the elements of both surprise and intimidation…) Therefore, we’ll keep our chicken and bean heavy diet going, continue using olive oil regularly, skip the pasta, pizza, chinese food which are our fallbacks, and make more forays into salmon (which Sam’s Club usually has at moderately good prices).

Also, should I have coffee with any of you, don’t add milk or sugar to it in front of me - I’m off milk and sugar for the first two weeks as well, and coffee tastes abysmal with Splenda in it. I’d hate to have a nervous breakdown watching someone drink coffee as it should be….

-j.

15 Jun 2008 A Cameo…
 |  Category: Jonathan - General |  One Comment

Since this blog is the Anne show, and she does a thorough job updating the world on our doings, there is not much for me to say in that regard. We make a good team, as my preference is usually to focus on the more abstract / theoretical / etc.

With that in mind, I just purchased two new books on Amazon.com (goooo giftcards!). The first is called Doors of the Sea: Where Was God in the Tsunami - it’s basically an exploration of theodicy. Theodicy is defined as:[v]indication of the divine attributes, esp. justice and holiness, in respect to the existence of evil. If it’s not obvious, the book deals with questions of evil in relation to the Indian ocean tsunami of 2004. The reference is to a phrase from Job 38:8. Job 38 states in context:

8 Who shut up the sea with doors, when it broke forth as issuing out of the womb :

9 when I made a cloud the garment thereof, and wrapped it in a mist as in swaddling bands?

10 I set my bounds around it, and made it bars and doors :

11And I said : Hitherto thou shalt come, and shalt go no further, and here thou shalt break thy swelling waves.

Job itself is a discussion strongly centered in theodicy, and ends with the idea that we cannot know why evil acts occur; that such knowledge is left to God. For instance, Job 42 states:

1Then Job answered the Lord, and said :

2 I know that thou canst do all things, and no thought is hid from thee.

3 Who is this that hideth counsel without knowledge? Therefore I have spoken unwisely, and things that above measure exceeded my knowledge.

4 Hear, and I will speak : I will ask thee, and do thou tell me.

5 With the hearing of the ear, I have heard thee, but now my eye seeth thee.

6 Therefore I reprehend myself, and do penance in dust and ashes.

The question of evil is one of the great questions which faces humans - how to reconcile the actions of a loving God with evil, whether natural or unnatural. C.S. Lewis dealt with the question in his book The Problem of Pain, but he is one in many authors who consider the issue. I look forwards to reading this text.

Interestingly, the second book is related to the question of evil. It’s called Original Sin: A Cultural History, by Alan Jacobs. He writes for one of my favorite magazines on occasion, First Things. It’s a brand new book, so I don’t have much more information on reviews. However, it did garner a good review in the Wall Street Journal, so it’s another book which should provide interesting insights into the idea of original sin.

-j.

18 Apr 2008 Earthquake…
 |  Category: Jonathan - General, Weather |  2 Comments

Though my friends from California described it as minor, they noticed it too. Apparently, an earthquake measuring 5.4 on the Richter scale struck (not sure of that term) in the middle of southern Illinois at about 5:40 EST this morning. Here’s a map:

And here’s a link to zip codes who report feeling the quake:

http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/shake/STORE/X2008qza6/ciim_stats_1.html

Fun stuff!

-j. 

05 Apr 2008 Study confirms it!
 |  Category: Jonathan - General, fun |  Leave a Comment

The sins of lust and greed are indeed related!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080405/ap_on_sc/finance_and_sex;_ylt=AtoC2VPD6CGR4K11PPn4ksoDW7oF

Yes, Christians have been telling you this for over 1,000 years, but did you listen until some Stanford researcher spent money to prove it? Nooooo.

-j.

31 Mar 2008 Blaring Music
 |  Category: Family, Jonathan - General |  Leave a Comment

So, Anne and I were sitting in the basement last week, playing with the girls, and I put a mixed CD of soundtracks on. The volume level was fine until we got to the score from “Goldfinger” which has a quiet beginning, followed by a blare of trumpets. I left the volume up to see how the girls would react. Claire ignored the blare and continued her playing. However, Maddie froze, cocked her head at the speaker, grinned hugely, and signed “More” twice.

 So cool.

-j.

21 Mar 2008 Gone wild…
 |  Category: Jonathan - General, fun |  Leave a Comment

After the recent revelations that Spitzer’s girl was formerly videotaped on Girls Gone Wild (but oooops…she was underage there), I have come up with a few candidates for “gone wild” shows…tell me if you think they’ll do well:

  • Geeks Gone Wild (Geeks remove their taped glasses, drink heavily, and begin yelling at each other in Klingon, all on tape!)
  • Amish Gone Wild (Those crazy Amish! First, it’s a rumspringa reality show, now see what really happens during barn raisings! “Look, she’s praying! Look…she’s…still praying!”)
  • Lawyers Gone Wild (No, not law students. Now you’ll see lawyers lying about billing hours, filing ridiculous briefs with the court, quashing subpoenas!)
  • Indiana Weather Gone Wild (It’s spring, and the snow actually stops!)(True fiction)
  • Town Meetings Gone Wild (See Roseland)
  • Catholics Gone Wild (Now there’s nothin’ good about Good Friday.)

:P

 -j.